QUOTE (Tais @ Jun 19 2006, 10:47 AM)

QUOTE (Jimbo Bimbo @ Feb 24 2006, 05:31 PM)

QUOTE (Grasshopper @ Feb 24 2006, 09:35 AM)

Fair enough. Obviously you make more use of them than anyone else that I've come across.
But I'm afraid I don't know a way of editing them outside Outlook. You'd really need info from Microsoft as to how the data is coded and I rather doubt that they'd supply that for obvious reasons.
Most Outlook rules that I use and come across on our 100+ client base follow the rough form:
IF STRING IN SENDER = X
MOVE TO FOLDER X
STOP PROCESSING MORE RULES
Since creating multiple such rules is not possible using Microsoft's Rules Wizard and since you can't edit the file that the Rules Export creates. Do you know of any third party software that you could use instead of Microsoft's Rules Wizard that would allow this?
This is not an uncommon request and I have been asked a similarly worded question more than a dozen times by people in our client base.
Did you find an editor to create and maintail rules? I have 50+ rules and would like an easy way to edit and change them, further I allways get into troubles when I change notebook.
Regards, Tais
The Rules system is a real problem in Outlook, it's very weak. The major problem I'm having is figuring out how to create rules that act on both Incoming and Outgoing emails: "Put all mail going to and coming from Fred into the Fred folder."
Why does Microsoft make this so difficult? It's a very basic concept that should have been there years ago. Yet either it simply can't be done now (in Outlook 2007 even), or it's well hidden! All I can figure out is that you need two separate rules to do this...which is why I went looking for a way to edit these .rwz files.
I'm a long-term geek; I'm switching over from Eudora (which makes this much easier, though even the Eudora team could have made it a few clicks easier), and I have literally hundreds of filters. I do a huge amount of business via email, so I like to optimize the whole process.
Microsoft, where the hell are you? What on earth were you thinking building a shoddy essential feature like this, while at the same time adding dozens of features nobody will use?!